Legislator Case Law & Legislation
I PRN 10/95 AI generated

Supreme Court allows severance pay for employee whose employment ended by privatization law equivalent to dismissal.

Case Number I PRN 10/95
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Poland partially overturned a lower court's dismissal of an employee's claim for severance pay following the privatization of their employer. The employee argued that the automatic termination of their appointment under privatization laws equated to a dismissal, entitling them to statutory notice pay, while the lower court incorrectly treated the claim as an unenforceable damages suit. The Supreme Court ruled that because the termination was legally equivalent to dismissal, the employee was entitled to severance pay under labor code provisions.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 9 ust. 2 ustawy o prywatyzacji przedsiębiorstw państwowych; Art. 70 § 2 k.p.: Termination of employment by operation of privatization law is legally equivalent to dismissal, granting the employee a right to severance pay for the notice period.

Keywords

AI generated
privatization termination severance pay entitlement employment law equivalence dismissal by operation of law labor code provisions

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 9 ust. 2 ustawy z dnia 13 lipca 1990 r. o prywatyzacji przedsiębiorstw państwowych
Art. 70 § 2 k.p.
Art. 69 pkt 2 lit. b k.p.
Art. 39 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 25 września 1981 r. o przedsiębiorstwach państwowych
Art. 422 § 2 k.p.c.
Art. 421 § 2 k.p.c.
art. 70 § 2 k.p
art. 421 § 2 k.p.c

Cited Case Law

AI generated
I PZP 66/92

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text