Legislator Case Law & Legislation
I PZP 12/95 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses request to determine legal relationship with non-party regarding energy tariff rights.

Case Number I PZP 12/95
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court refused to rule on the legal issue of whether a plaintiff could acquire a right to a discounted energy tariff based on a ministerial act. The plaintiff sought to establish a legal relationship with his former employer, claiming the employer's actions deprived him of the tariff benefit. The court held that determining the validity of the energy tariff act was unnecessary for the labor dispute and that the legal relationship in question only involved the employer, not the energy supplier.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 189 k.p.c.; Art. 391 § 1 k.p.c.: A request to determine the existence of a legal relationship connecting the plaintiff with a person not being the defendant cannot be effectively made if the resolution of the issue is not necessary for the review of the case.

Keywords

AI generated
legal relationship determination non-party defendant energy tariff rights ministerial act validity labor dispute scope standing to sue procedural prerequisites

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 189 k.p.c.
Art. 391 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 56 ust. 3 i 4 Ustawy Konstytucyjnej z dnia 17 października 1992 r.
Decyzja Ministra Górnictwa i Energetyki z dnia 12 stycznia 1982 r.
art. 189 k.p.c
art. 391 k.p.c
art. 391 § 1 k.p.c

Cited Case Law

AI generated
I PZP 45/94 OSNAPiUS 1995 nr 6 poz. 74

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text