Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
I PZP 11/95 AI generated

Supreme Court rules state employee severance pay is not reduced by unemployment benefits received during the same period.

Case Number I PZP 11/95
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court resolved a legal question regarding whether severance pay for state employees should be reduced by unemployment benefits received during the same period. The lower court had ruled that such a reduction was permissible, but the Supreme Court rejected this view based on statutory interpretation. The court held that the specific provision granting severance pay does not contain language allowing for offset against unemployment benefits, unlike provisions for pensions or allowances.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 13 ust. 1 pkt 2 ustawy z dnia 16 września 1982 r. o pracownikach urzędów państwowych; Art. 22 ust. 1 pkt 10 ustawy z dnia 16 października 1991 r. o zatrudnieniu i bezrobociu: Severance pay granted to state employees for a period not exceeding six months is not subject to reduction by unemployment benefits received during that period.

Keywords

AI generated
state employee severance pay unemployment benefits offset statutory interpretation literalism public sector compensation reduction of benefits

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 13 ust. 1 pkt 2 ustawy z dnia 16 września 1982 r. o pracownikach urzędów państwowych
Art. 22 ust. 1 pkt 10 ustawy z dnia 16 października 1991 r. o zatrudnieniu i bezrobociu
art. 391 k.p.c
art. 47 k.p
art. 47 § 2 k.p
art. 47 § 1 k.p
art. 57 § 3 k.p
art. 57 § 2 k.p
art. 57 k.p

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text