I PZP 10/95
AI generated
Employee earns vacation leave right after rehabilitation benefit ends despite zero work days in the calendar year.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court ruled that an employee retains the right to vacation leave starting January 1st even if they worked zero days due to a rehabilitation benefit. The plaintiff argued for vacation pay based on prior illness, while the defendant claimed the lack of work days negated the right. The court held that rehabilitation benefits legally substitute work, preserving the employee's entitlement to the subsequent annual vacation period.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 152 § 1 k.p.; Art. 153 k.p.; The right to vacation leave accrues to an employee who has not worked any days in a calendar year due to a rehabilitation benefit, as this benefit legally substitutes work.
Keywords
AI generated
rehabilitation benefit
vacation leave accrual
substitute for work
calendar year entitlement
employee rights
labor law principle
zero work days
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 152 § 1 k.p.
Art. 153 k.p.
Art. 171 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.
Art. 66 ust. 2 Karty Nauczyciela
Art. 53 k.p.
art. 391 k.p.c
art. 152 § 1 k.p
art. 153 k.p
art. 53 § 5 k.p
art. 174 § 1 k.p
Cited Case Law
AI generatedI PR 7/88
I PR 4/84
I PZP 27/92
I PRN 139/82