III ARN 7/95
AI generated
Supreme Court voids land division decision lacking owner's request, ruling it violates property rights and requires expropriation.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court of Poland voided administrative decisions approving a land division project without the landowner's request. The plaintiff argued that such a division violates property rights and requires expropriation procedures when the owner does not consent. The court agreed, holding that the administrative bodies erred by failing to obtain the owner's request, thus violating constitutional property protections.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 10 ust. 5 ustawy o gospodarce gruntami i wywłaszczaniu nieruchomości; Art. 7 Konstytucji RP: A land division for public road purposes cannot be approved without the owner's request; if absent, the only legal path is expropriation, as approving otherwise violates property rights and the rule of law.
Keywords
AI generated
land division procedure
owner's request requirement
expropriation necessity
property rights violation
administrative decision void
public road access
constitutional protection
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 10 ust. 5 ustawy z dnia 29 kwietnia 1985 r. o gospodarce gruntami i wywłaszczaniu nieruchomości
Art. 7 Przepisów Konstytucyjnych
Art. 422 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 207 § 1 k.p.a.
Art. 211 k.p.a.
Art. 208 k.p.a.
Art. 156 § 1 pkt 2 k.p.a.
art. 207 § 5 k.p
art. 420 § 2 k.p.c
art. 28 k.p