Legislator Case Law & Legislation
III AZP 12/94 AI generated

Supreme Court ruled the President's Office, not the Section, is the competent body for approving academic council decisions.

Case Number III AZP 12/94
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court resolved a legal question regarding which body within the Central Commission for Academic Titles must approve a departmental council's decision. The applicant argued the Section should decide, while the Court found the statutory language insufficient to grant exclusive power to a single Section. The Court adopted a systemic interpretation, concluding that the Commission as a whole, acting through its Presidium, retains the authority to ensure uniformity and procedural flexibility.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Ustawa o tytule naukowym i stopniach naukowych art. 34 ust. 1 i 3; statut Centralnej Komisji § 4 ust. 1: The Presidium of the Central Commission, not the individual Sections, is the competent body for issuing decisions on the approval of departmental council resolutions.

Keywords

AI generated
academic titles law competent authority systemic interpretation administrative decision Central Commission Presidium authority departmental council

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Ustawa z dnia 12 września 1990 r. o tytule naukowym i stopniach naukowych art. 34 ust. 1 i 3
statut Centralnej Komisji do Spraw Tytułu Naukowego i Stopni Naukowych § 4 ust. 1
Ustawa z dnia 12 września 1990 r. o tytule naukowym i stopniach naukowych art. 17 ust. 2
Ustawa z dnia 12 września 1990 r. o tytule naukowym i stopniach naukowych art. 32 ust. 1
Ustawa z dnia 12 września 1990 r. o tytule naukowym i stopniach naukowych art. 34 ust. 5
art. 391 k.p.c
art. 211 k.p
art. 104 k.p

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text