Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II UZP 38/94 AI generated

Sickness benefit lost if secondary job is burdensome or contradicts recovery goal during medical leave.

Case Number II UZP 38/94
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court ruled that continuing employment in a second workplace while on sick leave constitutes another gainful job, leading to the loss of the first benefit. The plaintiff argued the secondary income was negligible and would be returned, but the court emphasized that the nature of the work matters more than its value. The decision established that a doctor must determine if the secondary job is burdensome or incompatible with the primary goal of recovery.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 18 ust. 1; Art. 18 ust. 2 ustawy z dnia 17 grudnia 1974 r. o świadczeniach pieniężnych z ubezpieczenia społecznego w razie choroby i macierzyństwa: Continuing employment during medical leave constitutes another gainful job if the work is burdensome or contradicts the purpose of the leave, requiring a medical assessment of its impact on recovery.

Keywords

AI generated
sickness benefit medical leave secondary employment gainful activity burdensome work recovery goal social insurance

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 18 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 17 grudnia 1974 r. o świadczeniach pieniężnych z ubezpieczenia społecznego w razie choroby i macierzyństwa
Art. 18 ust. 2 ustawy z dnia 17 grudnia 1974 r. o świadczeniach pieniężnych z ubezpieczenia społecznego w razie choroby i macierzyństwa
Art. 391 k.p.c.
art. 391 k.p.c

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text