Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II URN 49/94 AI generated

Supreme Court allows disability pension claim by recognizing child care periods as non-contributory work credits under social insurance law.

Case Number II URN 49/94
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Poland revoked a lower court's dismissal of a disability pension claim due to a failure to consider periods of child care as non-contributory work credits. The applicant argued that time spent caring for a child under four years old should count toward the five-year employment requirement, but the lower court incorrectly treated these periods as mere interruptions in employment rather than statutory non-contributory periods. The court ruled that the specific social insurance statute explicitly defines such care periods as non-contributory credits that must be evaluated to determine if the employment condition is met, thereby overturning the previous decision and remanding the case for a fresh assessment.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 4 ust. 1 pkt 6 lit. a; Art. 4 ust. 2 ustawy z dnia 17 października 1991 r. o rewaloryzacji emerytur i rent: Periods of non-performance of work due to child care constitute non-contributory periods that must be considered when determining eligibility and the amount of benefits, up to one-third of contributory periods, regardless of whether they were preceded by work.

Keywords

AI generated
disability pension eligibility non-contributory work periods child care credits social insurance law employment condition requirement Supreme Court review remand for retrial

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 4 ust. 1 pkt 6 lit. a ustawy z dnia 17 października 1991 r. o rewaloryzacji emerytur i rent
Art. 4 ust. 2 ustawy z dnia 17 października 1991 r. o rewaloryzacji emerytur i rent
Art. 32 ustawy o z.e.p.
Art. 33 ustawy o z.e.p.
Art. 422 § 2 k.p.c.
art. 3 § 2 k.p.c
art. 417 § 1 k.p.c
art. 419 § 3 k.p.c
art. 422 § 2 k.p.c

Cited Case Law

AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text