Supreme Court allows extraordinary review for reorganization dismissals causing job cuts, overriding lower courts' intent requirement.

The Supreme Court granted an extraordinary review to overturn lower court rulings that dismissed workers' claims for severance pay. The workers argued that their contracts were terminated due to organizational changes that resulted in reduced staffing, while the employer claimed the sole purpose was discipline. The Court ruled that job reduction need not be the intended goal but must be an objective consequence of organizational changes to qualify under the relevant statute. Consequently, the appealed judgments were annulled, and the case was remanded for a new trial to determine the specific severance amounts.