Legislator Case Law & Legislation
I PRN 33/94 AI generated

Supreme Court quashes civil judgment for denying guardian to absent defendant, violating defense rights under Civil Procedure Code.

Case Number I PRN 33/94
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Poland quashed a lower court judgment ordering payment to a plaintiff against a defendant whose whereabouts were unknown. The Ministry of Justice argued the trial was invalid because the court failed to appoint a guardian for the defendant despite the plaintiff's request and police confirmation of the defendant's absence. The court ruled that denying a guardian when a party's location is unknown violates the right to defense and renders the proceedings void.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 143, 144, 369 pkt 5, 388 § 2, 421 § 2, 422 § 2 k.p.c.: If a party's whereabouts are unknown and a guardian is requested, failure to appoint one deprives the party of defense rights, invalidating the proceedings.

Keywords

AI generated
guardian appointment unknown whereabouts right to defense void proceedings civil procedure code supreme court review procedural invalidity

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 143 k.p.c.
Art. 144 k.p.c.
Art. 369 pkt 5 k.p.c.
Art. 388 § 2 k.p.c.
Art. 421 § 2 k.p.c.
Art. 422 § 2 k.p.c.
art. 369 pkt 5 k.p.c
art. 3 § 2 k.p.c
art. 139 k.p.c
art. 143 k.p.c

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text