I PZP 49/94
AI generated
Teacher on strike must repay advance salary unless specific law grants exemption from return obligation.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court ruled that a teacher participating in a strike must repay advance salary received for the strike period. The plaintiff sought repayment of unused wages, while the defendant argued the funds were consumed for living expenses and that ongoing negotiations implied the pay was due. The court held that labor law provisions regarding advance payments create an obligation to repay for unworked time unless a specific statute exempts the employee.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 39 ust. 3 Karty Nauczyciela; Art. 80, 86, 87 § 7 k.p.; Art. 23 ust. 2 ustawy o rozwiązywaniu sporów zbiorowych: An employee receiving advance salary must repay the amount for unworked time unless a specific provision grants a right to retain it.
Keywords
AI generated
advance salary repayment
strike action rights
teacher remuneration
labor law provisions
unjust enrichment
collective bargaining dispute
employment contract terms
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 39 ust. 3 Karty Nauczyciela
Art. 80 k.p.
Art. 86 k.p.
Art. 87 § 7 k.p.
Art. 23 ust. 2 ustawy z dnia 23 maja 1991 r. o rozwiązywaniu sporów zbiorowych
Art. 409 k.c.
Art. 410 § 2 k.c.
art. 391 k.p.c
art. 409 k.c
art. 300 k.p