Legislator Case Law & Legislation
I PZP 49/94 AI generated

Teacher on strike must repay advance salary unless specific law grants exemption from return obligation.

Case Number I PZP 49/94
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court ruled that a teacher participating in a strike must repay advance salary received for the strike period. The plaintiff sought repayment of unused wages, while the defendant argued the funds were consumed for living expenses and that ongoing negotiations implied the pay was due. The court held that labor law provisions regarding advance payments create an obligation to repay for unworked time unless a specific statute exempts the employee.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 39 ust. 3 Karty Nauczyciela; Art. 80, 86, 87 § 7 k.p.; Art. 23 ust. 2 ustawy o rozwiązywaniu sporów zbiorowych: An employee receiving advance salary must repay the amount for unworked time unless a specific provision grants a right to retain it.

Keywords

AI generated
advance salary repayment strike action rights teacher remuneration labor law provisions unjust enrichment collective bargaining dispute employment contract terms

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 39 ust. 3 Karty Nauczyciela
Art. 80 k.p.
Art. 86 k.p.
Art. 87 § 7 k.p.
Art. 23 ust. 2 ustawy z dnia 23 maja 1991 r. o rozwiązywaniu sporów zbiorowych
Art. 409 k.c.
Art. 410 § 2 k.c.
art. 391 k.p.c
art. 409 k.c
art. 300 k.p

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text