Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II UZP 31/94 AI generated

Early retirement right for appointed employee retained even after administrative court annulled dismissal decision.

Case Number II UZP 31/94
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court ruled that an appointed employee retains the right to early retirement even after an administrative court annulled the dismissal decision. The facts show the employee was dismissed due to institutional reorganization, which the Supreme Court determined did not formally qualify as a statutory ground for termination. The court held that the substantive circumstances of the dismissal, rather than the formal legal basis, determine eligibility, and the subsequent reinstatement does not negate the acquired right to early retirement.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 1 ust. 1 ustawy o szczególnych zasadach rozwiązywania z pracownikami stosunków pracy z przyczyn dotyczących zakładu pracy; § 1 rozporządzenia Ministra Pracy i Polityki Socjalnej z dnia 26 stycznia 1990 r.: The right to early retirement for an appointed employee is determined by the factual circumstances of the termination of employment, not by the formal legal ground for dismissal, and remains valid even if the dismissal decision is subsequently annulled.

Keywords

AI generated
appointed employee early retirement right dismissal annulment substantive circumstances formal legal ground reinstatement effects administrative law

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 1 ust. 1 of the Act on Special Rules for Termination of Employment with Employees due to Reasons Relating to the Enterprise
§ 1 of the Minister of Labour and Social Policy Regulation of 26 January 1990 on Early Retirement for Employees Dismissed due to Reasons Relating to the Enterprise
Art. 12 of the Act on Special Rules for Termination of Employment with Employees due to Reasons Relating to the Enterprise
art. 391 k.p.c
art. 201 § 1 k.p
art. 207 § 2 pkt 1 k.p
art. 209 k.p
art. 5 k.p
art. 51 § 1 k.p

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text