Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
II PRN 6/94 AI generated

Supreme Court quashes work accident determination due to insufficient evidence proving the event occurred after work relationship ended.

Case Number II PRN 6/94
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Poland quashed the Regional Court's decision denying a work accident claim due to insufficient evidence regarding the timing of the employee's fall. The Ministry of Justice argued that the lower court arbitrarily concluded the injury happened after the employee left the workplace without proper investigation. Consequently, the case was remanded for a comprehensive factual review to determine if the accident occurred during the employment relationship.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 3 § 2 k.p.c.; Art. 6 ust. 1 ustawy o świadczeniach z tytułu wypadków przy pracy i chorób zawodowych: A determination that a sudden event caused by an external factor occurred after the termination of the work relationship must be based on evidence supporting that hypothesis and cannot be arbitrary.

Keywords

AI generated
work accident determination evidence standard work relationship termination supreme court review remand for retrial external cause interest of the state

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 3 § 2 k.p.c.
Art. 6 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 12 czerwca 1975 roku o świadczeniach z tytułu wypadków przy pracy i chorób zawodowych
Art. 421 § 2 k.p.c.
Art. 422 § 2 k.p.c.
Art. 189 k.p.c.
art. 3 § 2 k.p.c
art. 189 k.p.c

Cited Case Law

AI generated
Uchwała Sądu Najwyższego z dnia 11 maja 1994 r. II PZP 1/94

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text