I PZP 45/94
AI generated
Supreme Court dismisses claim for hazardous work determination due to lack of legal interest when administrative benefits are available.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the plaintiff's claim to establish a period of hazardous work against an employer. The plaintiff argued this was necessary to obtain a pre-retirement unemployment benefit, while the employer contended the work was not hazardous. The court ruled that since the Reemployment Office administers the benefit independently, the plaintiff lacks legal interest in a separate civil lawsuit.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 189 k.p.c.; Art. 21 ust. 5 pkt 2 i ust. 8 ustawy o zatrudnieniu i bezrobociu: Where a statutory benefit is determined by an administrative body, a party lacks legal interest in seeking a separate judicial determination of the factual prerequisites for that benefit.
Keywords
AI generated
lack of legal interest
administrative procedure
unemployment benefit
hazardous work
civil litigation
reemployment office
pre-retirement benefit
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 189 k.p.c.
Art. 21 ust. 5 pkt 2 i ust. 8 ustawy z dnia 16 października 1991 r. o zatrudnieniu i bezrobociu
art. 391 k.p.c
art. 189 k.p.c
art. 248 § 1 pkt 6 k.p
Cited Case Law
AI generatedV UZP 5/78
I PRN 107/85
III PZP 19/87