Legislator Case Law & Legislation
I PZP 44/94 AI generated

Supreme Court rules dismissal of dismissal is dismissal only if it meets labor code termination criteria.

Case Number I PZP 44/94
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court resolved a legal question regarding whether a director's removal from a state enterprise constitutes immediate termination or merely a dismissal. The court found that the removal is only equivalent to termination without notice if the reasons also satisfy the specific fault requirements of the Labor Code. Consequently, the court determined that the legal characterization depends on factual findings rather than statutory citation alone.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Ustawa z dnia 25 września 1981 r. o przedsiębiorstwach państwowych, art. 37a ust. 1 pkt 1 i 3; Kodeks pracy, art. 52 § 1 pkt 1 i 2, art. 70 § 3 k.p.: A dismissal of a director of a state enterprise is equivalent to termination of the employment contract without notice only if the reasons for dismissal also constitute serious breach of duties under the Labor Code.

Keywords

AI generated
state enterprise director dismissal without notice Labor Code termination serious breach of duties employment contract resolution

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Ustawa z dnia 25 września 1981 r. o przedsiębiorstwach państwowych (tekst jednolity: Dz. U. z 1991 r., nr 18, poz. 80 ze zm.)
Kodeks pracy, art. 52 § 1 pkt 1 i 2
Kodeks pracy, art. 70 § 3 k.p.
Kodeks postępowania cywilnego, art. 391 k.p.c.
art. 391 k.p.c
art. 70 § 3 k.p
art. 70 § 2 k.p
art. 53 § 1 k.p
art. 53 k.p
art. 52 § 1 pkt 3 k.p

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text