Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II UR 8/94 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses legal question submission due to insufficient factual findings on disability onset date.

Case Number II UR 8/94
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the request to resolve a legal question regarding disability pension eligibility because the lower court failed to establish the precise date of disability onset. The applicant argued he became disabled before starting his business, but the medical experts could not determine the exact date due to conflicting evidence and lack of documentation. The court ruled that the legal issue is premature without a thorough re-examination of medical opinions and additional evidence on the disability's timeline.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 391 k.p.c.; Art. 388 § 1 k.p.c.: A legal question submitted to the Supreme Court must be resolved only after the factual circumstances, particularly the date of disability onset, have been properly ascertained through a complete evidentiary process.

Keywords

AI generated
legal question submission disability pension eligibility date of disability onset medical expert opinion premature legal question

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 391 k.p.c.
art. 388 § 1 k.p.c.
art. 391 k.p.c
art. 388 § 1 k.p.c

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text