Legislator Case Law & Legislation
III ARN 54/94 AI generated

Supreme Court quashes administrative court decision for procedural errors regarding service of documents and missed deadlines.

Case Number III ARN 54/94
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Poland quashed a lower administrative court's decision dismissing a company's appeal due to a missed deadline. The lower court rejected the appeal without verifying whether the final customs decision had been properly served to the company's authorized representative, who was hospitalized at the time. The Supreme Court ruled that the appeal was not untimely because the decision was never legally served, and the lower court erred by issuing a dismissal without first examining the validity of service or the request to restore the deadline.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 45 k.p.a.; Art. 204 § 1, 2 k.p.a.; Art. 422 § 1, 2 k.p.c. The Supreme Court held that an administrative court cannot declare an appeal untimely if the final administrative decision was not properly served to the party, and such a dismissal is void if issued without first reviewing the request to restore the deadline or verifying the facts of service.

Keywords

AI generated
service of documents missed deadline restoration of term administrative appeal procedural error customs decision supreme court review

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 45 k.p.a.
Art. 133 § 2 i 3 k.p.c.
Art. 211 k.p.a.
Art. 199 § 1 k.p.a.
Art. 200 § 1 k.p.a.
Art. 204 § 1 k.p.a.
Art. 204 § 2 k.p.a.
Art. 167-172 k.p.c.
Art. 171 k.p.c.
Art. 169 § 1-3 k.p.c.
Art. 200 § 2 k.p.a.
Art. 422 § 1 i 2 k.p.c.
Art. 1 Ustawy Konstytucyjnej z dnia 17 października 1992 r.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text