Legislator Case Law & Legislation
I PZP 42/94 AI generated

Supreme Court allows employment contract for board member-manager, rejecting mandatory appointment rule.

Case Number I PZP 42/94
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court resolved a legal question regarding whether a board member-manager must be employed via appointment or if an employment contract is permissible. The plaintiff argued for reinstatement based on an employment contract, while the defendant claimed the relationship was solely an appointment under the Labor Code. The court ruled that while appointment is possible, it is not exclusive, allowing parties to choose the basis of employment to better protect the worker.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 68 § 1 k.p.; Art. 18 § 2 k.p.; The Labor Code's provision on appointment for plant managers does not preclude the establishment of an employment contract, as party autonomy and the principle of favoring the employee allow for alternative bases of employment.

Keywords

AI generated
Labor Code Employment Contract Appointment Rule Board Member Party Autonomy Labor Relations Supreme Court

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 68 § 1 k.p.
Art. 18 § 2 k.p.
Art. 197 § 2 k.h.
art. 391 k.p.c
art. 68 § 1 k.p
art. 18 k.p
art. 18 § 2 k.p

Cited Case Law

AI generated
I PZ 45/75
I PR 202/76
I PZP 2/80
III PZP 45/87
I PRN 37/76

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text