Legislator Case Law & Legislation
I PRN 72/94 AI generated

Temporary appointment does not terminate employment; employee retains claim to reinstatement and back pay.

Case Number I PRN 72/94
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court partially allowed the extraordinary review, setting aside lower court rulings that dismissed the employee's claim. The court clarified that a temporary appointment to a state enterprise's interim director does not automatically terminate an existing employment contract unless explicitly agreed otherwise. Consequently, the employee retains a right to reinstatement to their previous position and compensation for the period of unavailability.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 33 ust. 3 ustawy o przedsiębiorstwach państwowych; Art. 22 § 1 k.p.; Art. 81 § 1 k.p.; Art. 421 § 2 k.p.c.; Art. 422 § 2 k.p.c. - The temporary designation of an employee previously employed by the enterprise as an interim director does not constitute a termination of the employment relationship, thereby preserving the employee's right to reinstatement and damages.

Keywords

AI generated
temporary director appointment termination of employment reinstatement claim extraordinary review state enterprise law back pay entitlement labor contract continuity

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 33 ust. 3 ustawy z dnia 25 września 1981 r. o przedsiębiorstwach państwowych
Art. 22 § 1 k.p.
Art. 81 § 1 k.p.
Art. 30 § 1 pkt 4 k.p.
Art. 421 § 2 k.p.c.
Art. 422 § 2 k.p.c.
art. 30 § 1 pkt 4 k.p
art. 22 § 1 k.p
art. 81 § 1 k.p
art. 3 § 2 k.p.c

Cited Case Law

AI generated
I PZP 37/93

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text