I PRN 71/94
AI generated
Supreme Court quashes labor court rulings on strike pay deductions due to procedural errors and missing interest terms.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court quashed lower court judgments regarding a teacher's claim for unpaid strike wages and ordered the case remanded for retrial. The plaintiff argued that deductions made in subsequent months violated the Code of Labor Law, while the defendant relied on collective bargaining regulations. The court found a procedural error because the lower courts ignored the requirement for written consent for such deductions and failed to determine specific interest periods, making a final judgment on the merits impossible.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 87 § 7 k.p.; Art. 91 k.p.; Art. 422 § 1, 2 k.p.c.: Deductions from wages for strike absence require written consent for subsequent months; failure to ascertain interest periods precludes final judgment on the merits.
Keywords
AI generated
strike pay deductions
labor code provisions
written consent requirement
interest period calculation
procedural error
remand for retrial
wage protection
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 87 § 7 k.p.
Art. 91 k.p.
Art. 422 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 422 § 2 k.p.c.
art. 87 § 7 k.p
art. 91 k.p
art. 422 § 2 k.p.c
art. 87 § 1 k.p
art. 108 k.p
art. 87 k.p