Minor working for father's business in shared household is insured as collaborator, not employee.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court ruled that a minor employed by his father to learn a trade, living in a shared household, must be insured as a collaborator rather than an employee. The appellant argued that the employment contract should exempt him from the business insurance scheme, but the court found this would leave the minor uninsured. The decision rests on the principle that simultaneous employment in a shared household precludes employee status, ensuring coverage under the business insurance law.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedUstawa z dnia 18 grudnia 1976 r. o ubezpieczeniu społecznym osób prowadzących działalność gospodarczą; Art. 2 ust. 1 pkt 1; Art. 26 ust. 3: A minor working for a relative in a shared household is insured as a collaborator, not an employee, because concurrent employment in a shared household precludes employee status.