Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II UZP 27/94 AI generated

Minor working for father's business in shared household is insured as collaborator, not employee.

Case Number II UZP 27/94
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court ruled that a minor employed by his father to learn a trade, living in a shared household, must be insured as a collaborator rather than an employee. The appellant argued that the employment contract should exempt him from the business insurance scheme, but the court found this would leave the minor uninsured. The decision rests on the principle that simultaneous employment in a shared household precludes employee status, ensuring coverage under the business insurance law.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Ustawa z dnia 18 grudnia 1976 r. o ubezpieczeniu społecznym osób prowadzących działalność gospodarczą; Art. 2 ust. 1 pkt 1; Art. 26 ust. 3: A minor working for a relative in a shared household is insured as a collaborator, not an employee, because concurrent employment in a shared household precludes employee status.

Keywords

AI generated
social insurance collaborator status shared household minor employment business insurance law employee exclusion family business

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Ustawa z dnia 18 grudnia 1976 r. o ubezpieczeniu społecznym osób prowadzących działalność gospodarczą oraz ich rodzin
Ustawa z dnia 25 listopada 1986 r. o organizacji i finansowaniu ubezpieczeń społecznych
art. 391 k.p.c
art. 202 § 3 k.p

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text