Legislator Case Law & Legislation
I PRN 61/94 AI generated

Supreme Court suspends civil proceedings when a lower court fails to consider Constitutional Court rulings on conflicting laws.

Case Number I PRN 61/94
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Poland quashed lower court judgments and remanded the case for retrial because the courts failed to suspend proceedings. The plaintiff, a judge, sought back pay based on specific judicial salary laws, while the defendant argued for general budgetary rates. The Supreme Court held that the lower courts ignored existing Constitutional Court rulings declaring similar budgetary provisions unconstitutional, thereby violating the duty to suspend proceedings under the Civil Procedure Code.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 177 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.; Art. 422 § 2 k.p.c.: A civil court must suspend proceedings of its own motion when a Constitutional Court ruling declares a law applicable to the case unconstitutional, even if the question was raised in a different case.

Keywords

AI generated
suspension of proceedings Constitutional Court ruling conflicting laws judicial salary civil procedure code remand for retrial unconstitutional law

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 177 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.
Art. 422 § 2 k.p.c.
Art. 477 § 3 pkt 1 k.p.c.
Art. 423 § 1 k.p.c.
art. 177 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c
art. 174 § 1 k.p.c
art. 422 § 2 k.p.c
art. 423 § 1 k.p.c

Cited Case Law

AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text