I PZP 34/94 AI generated

Supreme Court allows union withdrawal of authorization for non-union lawyer representing employee under labor law.

Case Number I PZP 34/94

Court / Authority Sąd Najwyższy

Jurisdiction

Poland (PL)

Decision Date 1994-08-25

Outcome Allowed / Granted

Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court resolved a legal question regarding whether a trade union could revoke a lawyer's authorization to represent an employee. The employee had authorized a non-union lawyer to act as a union representative, but the union later withdrew this specific authorization. The court held that such withdrawal was valid because the authorization under Article 465 § 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure required both the union's permission and the employee's consent, and the loss of union permission invalidated the representation.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 465 § 1 k.p.c.; A trade union may revoke an authorization granted to a non-union lawyer to represent an employee as a union representative, thereby invalidating the representation if the union's consent is a requisite condition.

Keywords

AI generated

trade union authorization labor law representation civil procedure code revocation of mandate employee representative non-union lawyer procedural capacity

Cited Legislation

AI generated

Art. 465 § 1 k.p.c.

Art. 86 k.p.c.

Art. 87 § 1 k.p.c.

Art. 89 § 2 k.p.c.

Art. 61 k.p.c.

Art. 63 k.p.c.

Art. 462 k.p.c.

art. 391 k.p.c

art. 465 § 1 k.p.c

art. 89 § 2 k.p.c

Supreme Court allows union withdrawal of authorization for non-union lawyer representing employee under labor law.

Legislator summary

Legislator headnote

Keywords

Cited Legislation

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Full text