Legislator Case Law & Legislation
I PRN 53/94 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses appeal, ruling constitutional review of budget laws belongs to the Constitutional Tribunal, not judges.

Case Number I PRN 53/94
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the extraordinary revision appeal filed by the Ministry of Justice against a lower court's award of salary arrears to a judge. The lower court had ordered the state to pay the difference between the actual and budgeted salaries, arguing that the budget law could not legally reduce existing wages. The Supreme Court held that determining whether these budget provisions violated the Constitution is exclusively the jurisdiction of the Constitutional Tribunal, not the ordinary courts or the Supreme Court itself.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 62 Konstytucji RP; Art. 33 ust. 1 Konstytucji RP: The assessment of whether budgetary regulations on judicial salaries comply with the Constitution is the exclusive competence of the Constitutional Tribunal, not the ordinary courts or the Supreme Court.

Keywords

AI generated
constitutional review jurisdiction budget law validity judicial salary arrears ordinary court limitation Constitutional Tribunal competence

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 62 Konstytucji RP
Art. 33 ust. 1 Konstytucji RP
Art. 422 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 25 ust. 1 ustawy o Trybunale Konstytucyjnym
art. 1 Konstytucji RP
art. 62 Konstytucji RP
art. 422 § 1 k.p.c

Cited Case Law

AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text