Legislator Case Law & Legislation
I PRN 43/94 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses extraordinary review for late filing, allowing partial interest award despite bankruptcy law.

Case Number I PRN 43/94
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the extraordinary review filed by the First President of the Supreme Court due to a procedural violation. The plaintiff sought interest on a severance payment from a bankrupt employer, arguing the debt belonged to the bankruptcy estate, while the defendant contended bankruptcy law suspended interest accrual from the declaration date. Although the review was procedurally inadmissible, the Court noted the interest awarded was small and did not harm the state's interest, thus allowing the lower court's partial award to stand.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 33 § 1 of the Bankruptcy Law; Art. 421 § 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure: The extraordinary review is inadmissible if filed after the statutory deadline, even if the substantive ruling on bankruptcy interest accrual was incorrect, provided the error does not harm the state's interest.

Keywords

AI generated
extraordinary review bankruptcy law interest accrual severance payment procedural deadline state interest bankruptcy estate

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 33 § 1 Prawa upadłościowego
art. 174 § 1 pkt 4 k.p.c.
art. 421 § 2 k.p.c.
art. 174 § 1 pkt 4 k.p.c
art. 359 k.c
art. 421 § 2 k.p.c

Cited Case Law

AI generated
wyrok SN z dnia 27 lipca 1990 r., I PRN 28/90, OSNCP 1991 z. 8-9 poz. 112
wyrok Sądu Apelacyjnego w Gdańsku z dnia 29 czerwca 1993 r., sygn. akt III APr 41/93

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text