I PA 2/94
AI generated
Supreme Court dismisses appeal as inadmissible because it targets the Minister's revocation decision, not the original entry decision.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court rejected the National Bar Council's appeal against the Minister of Justice's decision to revoke a previous objection to a lawyer's entry on the bar list. The Council argued the revocation violated specific statutes, but the Minister contended the Council lacked standing to appeal the revocation itself. The court ruled that the appeal was inadmissible because the correct legal target for review was the original entry decision, not the subsequent revocation.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 69 ust. 2 i 3 ustawy o adwokaturze; Art. 199 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.: An appeal against a Minister's decision revoking an objection to a bar entry is inadmissible because the proper subject of review is the original entry decision, not the revocation.
Keywords
AI generated
inadmissible appeal
bar entry list
Minister of Justice
standing to appeal
revocation decision
legal standing
procedural admissibility
Cited Legislation
AI generatedart. 69 ust. 2 i 3 ustawy z dnia 26 maja 1982 r. - Prawo o adwokaturze
art. 199 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.
art. 355 i art. 393 § 1 k.p.c.
art. 211 k.p.a.
art. 154 § 1 k.p.a.
art. 199 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c
art. 393 § 1 k.p.c
art. 211 k.p
art. 154 § 1 k.p