Legislator Case Law & Legislation
III ARN 27/94 AI generated

Customs refund claim dismissed for late filing; court ruled regulation exceeded statutory authority.

Case Number III ARN 27/94
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court set aside the Customs Office's decision denying a customs refund claim filed after the goods were exported. The Customs Office argued the claim was invalid because it was not submitted simultaneously with the customs procedure initiation request, citing a specific regulation. The court held that this regulation exceeded its statutory authority by imposing a deadline not found in the Customs Law, thereby invalidating the rejection of the refund request.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 80 ust. 1 Prawa celnego; § 2 rozporządzenia Ministra Współpracy Gospodarczej z Zagranicą: A subordinate regulation cannot establish deadlines or additional obligations that contradict the substantive scope of the enabling Act, and such overreach renders administrative decisions based on it void.

Keywords

AI generated
customs refund claim statutory authority regulation validity procedural deadline administrative law customs procedure subordinate legislation

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 80 ust. 1 Prawa celnego
§ 2 rozporządzenia Ministra Współpracy Gospodarczej z Zagranicą z dnia 31 sierpnia 1990 r.
art. 50 ust. 1 Prawa celnego
art. 52 ust. 2 pkt 2 Prawa celnego
art. 422 § 1 k.p.c.
art. 211 k.p.a.
art. 422 § 1 k.p.c
art. 211 k.p

Cited Case Law

AI generated
III AZP 10/93

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text