Legislator Case Law & Legislation
I PZP 21/94 AI generated

Civil procedure allows legal counsel to act as a process agent for a business client without being an employee.

Case Number I PZP 21/94
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court resolved a legal question regarding whether a legal counsel could represent a business client in a specific labor dispute without being that client's employee. The lower court had rejected a request for service of judgment because the counsel, acting for a law firm, was not formally employed by the defendant company. The court ruled that the statutory requirement for an employee status was superseded by the 1982 Legal Counsel Act, which permits independent legal services on a contract basis. Consequently, the court held that a legal counsel providing business services under the relevant commercial activity law may validly serve as a process agent for the client.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 87 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 24 ust. 1 ustawy o działalności gospodarczej; Art. 8 ust. 1 ustawy o radcach prawnych; A legal counsel providing independent business services may act as a process agent for a corporate client without being that client's employee.

Keywords

AI generated
process agent legal counsel business client employment status civil procedure legal services contractual representation

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 87 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 133 § 3 k.p.c.
Art. 391 k.p.c.
Art. 391 § 2 k.p.c.
Art. 24 ust. 1 ustawy o działalności gospodarczej
Art. 2 ust. 1 ustawy o działalności gospodarczej
Art. 8 ust. 1 ustawy o radcach prawnych
Art. 20 ust. 1 ustawy o radcach prawnych
Art. 7 pkt. 6 ustawy o radcach prawnych
Art. 371 § 1 k.p.c.

Cited Case Law

AI generated
III CZP 4/93

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text