Legislator Case Law & Legislation
I PRN 24/94 AI generated

Supreme Court quashes lower court ruling for denying plaintiff two-instance trial rights under Civil Procedure Code.

Case Number I PRN 24/94
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court quashed the lower court's judgment and remanded the case for retrial. The plaintiff argued that the appellate court violated her right to have her claim heard by two judicial instances by deciding the merits of a portion of the case the first instance had referred to a social insurance fund. The court held that the Civil Procedure Code guarantees a right to a two-instance trial regardless of the plaintiff's specific interest in the appeal, and the appellate court lacked authority to decide on matters not previously adjudicated by the first instance.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 367 k.p.c.; Art. 388 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 390 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 421 § 2 k.p.c.; Art. 14 MiP; Art. 6 KPP: The right to a two-instance trial is a fundamental procedural guarantee that cannot be waived; an appellate court may not decide on the merits of issues not previously adjudicated by the first instance, and such procedural violations constitute a breach of the state's interest.

Keywords

AI generated
two-instance trial right extraordinary revision procedural violation appellate jurisdiction limits interest of the state civil procedure code remand for retrial

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 367 k.p.c.
Art. 388 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 390 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 421 § 2 k.p.c.
Art. 14 MiP
Art. 6 KPP
art. 388 § 1 k.p.c
art. 367 k.p.c
art. 390 § 1 k.p.c
art. 421 § 2 k.p.c

Cited Case Law

AI generated
III ARN 41/90

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text