Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II PZP 3/94 AI generated

Solidary liability of split factories for pre-split occupational diseases applies even if diagnosis occurred post-split.

Case Number II PZP 3/94
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court resolved a legal question regarding whether newly formed factories from a plant division are jointly liable for an employee's occupational disease diagnosed after the split. The plaintiff, a former worker now receiving disability pension, sought compensation from the successor entities, while the original plant argued that only the factory where the disease was last contracted should be liable. The court ruled that Article 231 § 4 of the Labor Code mandates joint liability for all new entities created by the division for obligations arising before the organizational changes, regardless of where the disease was medically confirmed.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 231 § 4 k.p.; Art. 32 ust. 2 pkt 2 ustawy o świadczeniach z tytułu wypadków przy pracy i chorób zawodowych: In cases of a factory division, all newly created entities bear joint and several liability for occupational disease obligations arising prior to the organizational changes, irrespective of the timing of the medical diagnosis.

Keywords

AI generated
solidary liability factory division occupational disease Labor Code successor entities pre-split obligations joint responsibility

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 231 § 4 k.p.
Art. 32 ust. 2 pkt 2 ustawy z dnia 12 czerwca 1975 r. o świadczeniach z tytułu wypadków przy pracy i chorób zawodowych
Art. 391 k.p.c.
art. 391 k.p.c
art. 231 § 4 k.p
art. 231 k.p

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text