I PRN 14/94
AI generated
Supreme Court allows extraordinary revision against employee who withdrew appeal request but whose lawyer filed the revision.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court granted an extraordinary revision against Stanisław O., an employee who had withdrawn his request for a reasoned judgment while his lawyer filed the revision. The court found that the lower court incorrectly excluded him from the group of parties who waived the right to valuation due to inflation. Consequently, the Supreme Court upheld the revision and remanded the case for recalculation of the awarded compensation.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 358 § 3 k.c.; Art. 300 k.p.; Art. 384 k.p.c.: A party who withdraws a request for a reasoned judgment but whose lawyer files an extraordinary revision is not considered to have waived the right to valuation, and the lower court must recognize the revision.
Keywords
AI generated
extraordinary revision
withdrawal of appeal
lawyer representation
valuation of wages
inflation adjustment
procedural waiver
remand for recalculation
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 358 § 3 k.c.
Art. 300 k.p.
Art. 384 k.p.c.
Art. 422 § 2 k.p.c.
art. 358 § 2 k.c
art. 3581 § 3 k.c
art. 300 k.p
art. 384 k.p.c
art. 368 pkt 1 k.p.c
art. 422 § 2 k.p.c