Legislator Case Law & Legislation
I PRN 5/94 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses extraordinary review for non-gratious dismissal of monetary compensation claim due to ambiguous statutory language.

Case Number I PRN 5/94
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the extraordinary review filed by the Minister of Justice against a lower court's order granting monetary compensation to an employee. The lower court ruled that the employee was entitled to compensation because she accepted a new job at a different facility without receiving a formal employment offer from the new employer before her previous contract ended. The Supreme Court agreed that a preliminary agreement with a new employer is required to bar compensation but held that the lower court's interpretation was not a flagrant violation of law. Consequently, the review was rejected because the statutory provision was ambiguous and the error did not meet the high threshold for a flagrant violation.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 8 ust. 3 pkt 2 ustawy z dnia 28 grudnia 1989 r. o szczególnych zasadach rozwiązywania z pracownikami stosunków pracy z przyczyn dotyczących zakładu pracy; A flagrant violation of law requires a precise statutory provision, and ambiguous rules cannot be deemed flagrant violations merely because a court's interpretation differs from the literal text.

Keywords

AI generated
extraordinary review dismissal flagrant violation standard ambiguous statutory interpretation monetary compensation dismissal labor law procedural error

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 8 ust. 3 pkt 2 ustawy z dnia 28 grudnia 1989 r. o szczególnych zasadach rozwiązywania z pracownikami stosunków pracy z przyczyn dotyczących zakładu pracy oraz zmianie niektórych ustaw
art. 421 § 1 k.p.c.
art. 231 § 2 k.p
art. 421 § 1 k.p.c

Cited Case Law

AI generated
wyrok z dnia 25 kwietnia 1991 r., I PRN 4/91
wyrok z dnia 6 stycznia 1993 r., I PRN 69/92
wyrok z dnia 6 stycznia 1993 r., I PRN 67/92
wyrok z dnia 6 stycznia 1993 r., I PRN 71/92
wyrok z dnia 6 stycznia 1993 r., I PRN 65/92
wyrok z dnia 2 marca 1993 r. I PRN 13/93

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text