Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II PK 127/09 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses appeal regarding patent fee non-payment, ruling final decision only confirms lack of patent conditions.

Case Number II PK 127/09
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Poland dismissed the cassation appeal filed by multiple plaintiffs against KGHM P.M. SA regarding unpaid patent protection fees. The lower court had rejected the plaintiffs' claim for remuneration based on a rationalization project agreement, noting that the patent office's final decision regarding fee payment only conditionally confirmed the absence of statutory patent conditions. The court held that the final decision does not grant patent protection but merely suspends it until fees are paid, and thus the cassation arguments regarding fact-finding and procedural errors were inadmissible.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 316 ust. 4 Prawa własności przemysłowej; Art. 39813 § 2 k.p.c.: The final decision on patent fees only conditionally confirms lack of patent conditions without granting protection, and cassation cannot challenge fact-finding or evidence evaluation.

Keywords

AI generated
patent protection conditions protection fee payment cassation appeal dismissal industrial property law remuneration for rationalization procedural inadmissibility conditional patent grant

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 316 ust. 4 Prawa własności przemysłowej
Art. 39813 § 2 k.p.c.
Art. 386 § 4 k.p.c.
Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 382 k.p.c.
Art. 3983 § 3 k.p.c.
Art. 328 § 2 k.p.c.
Art. 162 k.p.c.
Art. 39815 § 1 k.p.c.
art. 385 k.p.c

Cited Case Law

AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text