Court dismissed appeal against traffic violation sentence, upholding facts and legal qualification of dangerous overtaking.

The Court of Appeal dismissed the defendant's appeal against a conviction for dangerous overtaking under Article 86 of the Road Traffic Act. The defendant argued that the evidence failed to prove the act constituted a violation and that the lower court arbitrarily assessed the testimony. The court rejected these claims, finding the witness testimony sufficient to establish the danger created by the overtaking maneuver and confirming the lower court's factual and legal assessment was correct.