II K 110/14
AI generated
Court convicts defendant of fraud and imposes suspended sentence with restitution order.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe court found the defendant guilty of fraud and imposed a prison sentence suspended for three years. The prosecution argued that the defendant defrauded banks by submitting forged employment certificates to obtain installment loans. The court accepted the evidence, noting the defendant's lack of prior record and positive criminal prognosis as grounds for the suspended sentence.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 286 § 1 kk; Art. 297 § 1 kk; Art. 270 § 1 kk: The court established that submitting forged documents to obtain financial benefits constitutes fraud and allows for a suspended sentence when the criminal prognosis is positive.
Keywords
AI generated
fraudulent loan
forged employment certificate
suspended sentence
criminal prognosis
restitution order
property seizure
court costs waiver
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 286 § 1 kk
Art. 297 § 1 kk
Art. 270 § 1 kk
Art. 11 § 2 kk
Art. 12 kk
Art. 286 § 1 kk w zw. z art. 11 § 3 kk
Art. 69 § 1 kk
Art. 69 § 2 kk
Art. 70 § 1 pkt 1 kk
Art. 63 § 1 kk
Art. 72 § 2 kk
Art. 44 § 2 kk
Art. 230 § 2 kpk
Art. 624 § 1 k.p.k.
Art. 17 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 23 czerwca 1973 roku o opłatach w sprawach karnych
Cited Case Law
AI generatedwyrok SN z dnia 10 maja 1995 roku, II KRN 28/95