II Ka 91/26 AI generated

Court dismissed appeal against criminal sentence, upholding original judgment on procedural and factual grounds.

Case Number II Ka 91/26

Court / Authority Sąd powszechny

Jurisdiction

Poland (PL)

Decision Date 2026-05-12

Outcome Dismissed

Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Court of Appeal dismissed the defendant's appeal against the first-instance criminal judgment, ruling in favor of the prosecution. The defense argued for a change in the verdict based on procedural errors and factual inaccuracies, but the appellate court found no merit in these claims. Consequently, the original sentence was upheld, and the appellant was ordered to pay the costs of the second instance proceedings.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 438 § 2, 3, 4 k.p.k.; Art. 636 § 1 k.p.k.; The appellate court may reject an appeal when the first-instance judgment is free of procedural errors, factual mistakes, or disproportionate sentencing.

Keywords

AI generated

criminal appeal procedure procedural error review factual findings assessment disproportionate penalty costs of proceedings upholding first instance criminal law appeal

Cited Legislation

AI generated

Art. 438 § 2 k.p.k.

Art. 438 § 3 k.p.k.

Art. 438 § 4 k.p.k.

Art. 636 § 1 k.p.k.

Art. 8 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 23 czerwca 1973 roku o opłatach w sprawach karnych

§ 1 Rozporządzenia Ministra Sprawiedliwości z dnia 18 czerwca 2003 roku w sprawie wysokości i sposobu obliczania wydatków Skarbu Państwa postępowaniu karnym

art. 438 pkt 1 k.p.k

art. 438 pkt 2 k.p.k

art. 438 pkt 3 k.p.k

art. 438 pkt 4 k.p.k