II Ka 164/26
AI generated
Criminal appeal dismissed; court upheld original sentence for attempted theft due to lack of procedural errors.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe District Court in Siedlce dismissed the defendant's appeal against the first-instance judgment for attempted theft. The defense argued procedural violations and factual errors under Articles 438(2) and 438(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, but the appellate court found no such defects. Consequently, the original sentence was upheld, and the defendant was ordered to pay court costs.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 438 ust. 2, 3 k.p.k.; Art. 636 § 1 k.p.k.; The appellate court must reject an appeal if the first-instance judgment is free of procedural errors and factual mistakes that could have influenced the outcome.
Keywords
AI generated
criminal appeal
attempted theft
procedural error
factual error
court costs
Code of Criminal Procedure
upholding judgment
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 438 ust. 2 k.p.k.
Art. 438 ust. 3 k.p.k.
Art. 636 § 1 k.p.k.
Art. 11 ustawy z dnia 23 czerwca 1973 roku o opłatach w sprawach karnych
art. 438 pkt 1 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 2 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 3 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 4 k.p.k
art. 439 k.p.k
art. 437 § 2 k.p.k
Related Decisions
AI generatedII Ka 475/21
Court increases fine for animal cruelty and orders forfeiture of horses due to factual error.
IV Ka 620/22
Court dismissed defense appeal claiming factual errors regarding shoplifting intent and joint action.
II AKa 252/21
Appellate court partially allows appeal by correcting asset description and increasing compensation amount for fraud.
II AKa 215/20
Appellate court increases prison sentence for excessive penalty under Art. 438(4) k.p.k. and orders state costs.
II AKa 7/24
Appellate court partially allowed appeal regarding excessive compensation amount under Polish Civil Procedure Code.