Criminal appeal dismissed; court upheld conviction for theft and rejected defense's arguments on legal qualification and sentencing proportionality.

The District Court in Siedlce dismissed the defendant's appeal against the first-instance judgment convicting him of theft under Article 271 § 3 of the Criminal Code. The defense argued that the legal qualification was incorrect and the sentence was disproportionately harsh, citing specific procedural and substantive errors. The appellate court rejected these claims, finding no grounds to overturn the conviction or reduce the penalty, and upheld the original ruling while ordering the defendant to pay court costs.