IV Ka 555/20
AI generated
Appeal court upheld conviction for theft under Art. 96 § 3 k.w. and ordered costs against defendant.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe appeal court upheld the first-instance conviction of the defendant for theft under Article 96 § 3 of the Criminal Code. The defendant appealed the sentence imposed by the district court in Inowrocław, arguing against the penalty. The appellate court found no merit in the appeal and confirmed the original judgment while ordering the defendant to pay the second-instance fee and procedural costs.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 96 § 3 k.k.; Art. 385 § 1 k.k.: The appellate court may uphold a conviction and sentence if the lower court's decision is legally sound and facts are established, thereby confirming the defendant's liability for the crime of theft.
Keywords
AI generated
theft conviction
criminal appeal
Art. 96 k.k.
second instance
procedural costs
upheld judgment
Criminal Code
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 96 § 3 k.k.
Art. 385 § 1 k.k.