Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
II K 2/25 AI generated

Court sentenced defendant to 2 years 8 months prison for 34 fraud acts under Polish Criminal Code.

Case Number II K 2/25
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court convicted the defendant of 34 fraud acts committed between 2020 and 2021, resulting in significant financial losses for multiple victims. The prosecution argued that these acts constituted a continuous series of crimes under Article 91 of the Criminal Code, warranting a single consolidated sentence. The court accepted this argument, imposing a combined sentence of 2 years and 8 months imprisonment alongside a daily fine, while also ordering restitution for the damages caused.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 286 § 1 k.k.; Art. 91 § 1 k.k.; Art. 91 § 2 k.k.; Art. 33 § 2 k.k.; Art. 46 § 1 k.k.; Art. 63 § 1 k.k. – When multiple fraud acts are committed in short intervals using the same opportunity, they constitute a continuous series of crimes punishable by a single sentence.

Keywords

AI generated
fraudulent misrepresentation continuous series of crimes consolidated sentencing economic fraud criminal liability restitution of damages daily fine calculation

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 286 § 1 k.k.
Art. 12 § 1 k.k.
Art. 91 § 1 k.k.
Art. 91 § 2 k.k.
Art. 33 § 2 k.k.
Art. 53 k.k.
Art. 46 § 1 k.k.
Art. 63 § 1 k.k.
Art. 415a k.p.k.
Art. 624 § 1 k.p.k.
AI generated
III K 41/26
Court orders defendant to fully compensate victims for property damage and preferential payments under criminal law.
II AKa 219/13
Appeal dismissed; court upheld first-instance conviction for fraud and rejected defense's factual errors.
II AKa 64/12
Appeal court modifies sentence for accomplice M.S. by applying absorption rule and suspending probation for co-defendants.
II AKa 103/12
Appeal court reduced prison sentences for accounting fraud defendants due to excessive severity and lack of proportionality to guilt.
II AKa 278/18
Appeal court partially allowed appeal by reducing fraud sentence and removing civil liability for one defendant.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text