Legislator Case Law & Legislation
VIII U 2477/25 AI generated

Appeal against social security benefit denial dismissed due to lack of evidence for concurrent injury claims.

Case Number VIII U 2477/25
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court dismissed the appellant's appeal against the Social Security Institution's decision to deny concurrent benefits. The appellant argued that a new injury occurred during employment, warranting additional compensation, but failed to provide sufficient medical documentation proving the injury's work-related nature. Consequently, the court upheld the original denial, ruling that the statutory requirements for concurrent benefits were not met without corroborating evidence.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 10 ust. 1 k.r.s.; Art. 11 ust. 1 k.r.s.: Concurrent benefits are granted only when a new injury is medically proven to have occurred during employment, and the absence of such proof results in the denial of the claim.

Keywords

AI generated
concurrent benefits work-related injury social security appeal medical evidence standard denial of claim

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 10 ust. 1 k.r.s.
Art. 11 ust. 1 k.r.s.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt VIII U 2477/25

WYROK W IMIENIU

RZECZYPOSPOLITEJ POLSKIEJ Dnia 1 grudnia 2025 roku Sąd Okręgowy w Łodzi VIII Wydział Pracy i Ubezpieczeń Społecznych w składzie Przewodniczący sędzia SO Jacek Chrostek Protokolant sekretarz M. B. po rozpoznaniu w dniu 1 grudnia 2025 roku w Łodzi na rozprawie sprawy A. P. przeciwko Zakładowi Ubezpieczeń Społecznych (...) Oddział w Ł. o wypłatę świadczeń w zbiegu na skutek odwołania A. P. od decyzji Zakładu Ubezpieczeń Społecznych (...) Oddziału w Ł. z dnia 25 lipca 2025 roku znak (...) oddala odwołanie. SSO Jacek Chrostek