Criminal appeal upheld; sentence increased to 8 years and 1 month due to aggravating circumstances.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Court of Appeal partially upheld the appeal by increasing the defendant's sentence to eight years and one month of imprisonment. The defense argued for leniency, while the victim's representative contended for a harsher penalty based on the severity of the acts. The court rejected the defense's arguments and applied the law to impose a combined sentence, while also awarding legal costs to the victim's representatives.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 178a § 1 kk; Art. 177 § 2 kk; Art. 85 § 1 kk; Art. 86 § 1 kk; Art. 63 § 1 kk; Art. 438 pkt 2 k.p.k.; Art. 438 pkt 3 k.p.k.; Art. 438 pkt 4 k.p.k.: The court may increase the sentence and impose a combined penalty when the facts justify a harsher punishment, disregarding arguments regarding disproportionality if the original assessment was legally sound.