II Ka 793/25
AI generated
Court dismissed defense appeal on excessive sentence, upholding original penalty for attempted theft.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe court dismissed the defense's appeal regarding excessive sentencing while upholding the original conviction for attempted theft. The defendant argued the penalty was disproportionately harsh, but the appellate court found no evidence of a glaring disproportionality. Consequently, the judgment was modified only to order the payment of procedural costs and court fees.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 438 pkt. 4 k.p.k.; Art. 8 ust. 1 ustawy o opłatach w sprawach karnych; The court will not overturn a sentence unless the disproportionality is glaring and clearly affects the outcome.
Keywords
AI generated
excessive sentence
attempted theft
procedural costs
appellate review
proportionality principle
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 438 pkt. 4 k.p.k.
Art. 8 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 23 czerwca 1973 roku o opłatach w sprawach karnych
§ 1 Rozporządzenia Ministra Sprawiedliwości z 18 czerwca 2003 roku w sprawie wysokości i sposobu obliczania wydatków Skarbu Państwa w postępowaniu karnym
art. 438 pkt 1 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 2 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 3 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 4 k.p.k
art. 439 k.p.k
art. 53 k.k
art. 437 § 2 k.p.k
Related Decisions
AI generatedVI Ka 10/24
Criminal appeal dismissed; court upheld conviction for attempted robbery and rejected prosecutor's legal and factual arguments.
VII Ka 1009/24
Court partially allowed appeal by reducing daily fine and crediting prison time for tax evasion defendants.
IV Ka 717/21
Appeal dismissed; private prosecutor's evidence assessment upheld under Art. 7 of Criminal Procedure Code.
IV Ka 446/23
Appeal dismissed; court upheld conviction for tax fraud despite prior final judgment on same act.
II Ka 706/22
Court reduces sentence from 12 to 6 months and removes recidivism aggravation due to procedural error.