Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II Ka 709/25 AI generated

Court dismisses appeal on excessive sentence grounds, upholding original drug trafficking conviction and costs order.

Case Number II Ka 709/25
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The District Court in Siedlce dismissed the defendant's appeal regarding the excessive nature of the sentence imposed for drug trafficking. The defense argued the penalty was disproportionately high, but the court found no evidence of such disproportionality given the established facts. Consequently, the original conviction and the order for the defendant to pay court costs were upheld in full.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 62 ust. 1 ustawy o przeciwdziałaniu narkomanii; Art. 438 pkt 4 k.p.k.: The court will not set aside a sentence unless it is grossly disproportionate to the circumstances of the crime and the offender's culpability.

Keywords

AI generated
drug trafficking excessive sentence proportionality principle criminal appeal court costs disproportionate penalty Sąd Okręgowy

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 62 ust. 1 ustawy o przeciwdziałaniu narkomanii
Art. 438 pkt 4 k.p.k.
Art. 636 § 1 k.p.k.
Art. 8 ustawy o opłatach w sprawach karnych
art. 438 pkt 1 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 2 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 3 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 4 k.p.k
art. 439 k.p.k
art. 437 § 2 k.p.k
AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text