II K 63/19
AI generated
Court dismissed defense motion to exclude physical evidence, upholding its admissibility in drug trafficking case.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe court dismissed the defense's motion to exclude specific physical evidence from the trial record. The defense argued the evidence was improperly obtained or irrelevant to the drug trafficking charges against multiple defendants. The court rejected this claim, finding the evidence legally sufficient and directly relevant to proving the conspiracy and distribution of amphetamines.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 230 § 2 k.p.k.; Art. 231 k.p.k.: The court may order the return of physical evidence only if it is clearly irrelevant or improperly obtained; otherwise, such evidence remains admissible to establish criminal facts.
Keywords
AI generated
physical evidence exclusion
drug trafficking conspiracy
amphetamines distribution
criminal procedure law
defense motion dismissal
relevance of evidence
court order return
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 230 § 2 k.p.k.
Art. 231 k.p.k.
Art. 618 § 1 pkt. 11 k.p.k.
§ 2, § 4 ust. 2 i 3, § 17 ust. 2 pkt 5 i § 20 rozporządzenia Ministra Sprawiedliwości z dnia 03 października 2016 roku w sprawie ponoszenia przez Skarb Państwa kosztów nieopłaconej pomocy prawnej udzielonej przez adwokata z urzędu
Art. 627 k.p.k.
Art. 624 § 1 k.p.k.
art. 387 k.p.k
art. 280 § 1 k.k
art. 278 § 1 k.k
art. 286 § 1 k.k
Cited Case Law
AI generatedIII KK 257/06
Related Decisions
AI generatedII AKa 134/24
Appeal court reduced sentence for one defendant, upheld others, and rejected confiscation fines due to lack of necessity.
II AKa 122/17
Appeal court suspended sentence for B.B., credited time for H.H., and reclassified conduct for R.L. in drug trafficking case.
II AKa 35/16
Appeal court corrects drug trafficking sentencing basis and upholds acquittal against procedural complaints.
II AKa 93/13
Appeal court reduced sentence for one defendant but upheld convictions and penalties for others in drug trafficking case.