II K 302/24
AI generated
Court grants conditional probation for negligent destruction of a registered cultural heritage site.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe court convicted the defendant of negligently causing damage to a registered cultural heritage site and granted conditional probation for two years. The defendant argued that the damage resulted from a lack of knowledge rather than intentional action, while the prosecution emphasized the destruction of a protected wooden structure. The court accepted the finding of negligence but deemed the social harm insignificant, leading to a suspended sentence and a symbolic fine.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedUstawa z dnia 23 lipca 2023 r. o ochronie zabytków i opiece nad zabytkami; Kodeks karny; przestępstwo zaniechania konserwacji zabytku; warunkowe umorzenie postępowania karne; niska społeczna szkodliwość czynu.
Keywords
AI generated
negligent destruction of heritage
conditional probation sentence
cultural property protection
symbolic fine imposition
social harm assessment
Cited Legislation
AI generatedart. 108 ust. 2 ustawy z dnia 23 lipca 2023 roku o ochronie zabytków i opiece nad zabytkami
art. 66 § 1 kk
art. 67 § 1 kk
art. 67 § 3 kk
art. 627 kpk
art. 387 k.p.k
Related Decisions
AI generatedV K 3688/19
Court imposed combined sentences and suspended probation for multiple burglary and drug possession charges against minors.
III KK 231/21
Supreme Court dismisses cassation as obviously unfounded regarding robbery and recidivism charges.
II K 623/20
Court convicted defendant of property damage for unauthorized fence destruction, rejecting self-help defense.
I KO 25/23
Supreme Court dismisses retrial request as obviously unfounded due to lack of new facts or evidence.