Court allows plaintiff to correct land registry entries using geodetic documentation to match actual legal status.

The court granted the plaintiff's request to reconcile the land registry book with the actual legal state of the property. The plaintiff argued that geodetic documentation proved a discrepancy between the registered boundaries and the true physical situation, while the opposing party contested the admissibility of such external evidence. The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, permitting the correction based on the superior evidentiary value of the geodetic data.