II K 206/24
AI generated
Court convicts drunk driver of recidivism, imposing fine, driving ban, and victim compensation.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe court convicted the defendant of driving under the influence while previously sentenced for the same offense. The prosecution argued for a three-year driving ban and victim compensation, which the court upheld. The decision applied recidivism rules to increase the penalty while considering the defendant's employment status.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 178a § 1 kk; Art. 42 § 2 kk; Art. 43a § 2 kk; Art. 33 § 1 kk; Art. 33 § 3 kk: In cases of drunk driving by a recidivist, the court must impose a driving ban and victim compensation, adjusting the fine based on alcohol levels and criminal danger.
Keywords
AI generated
drunk driving recidivism
driving ban three years
victim compensation fund
daily fine calculation
procedural costs burden
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 178a § 1 kk
Art. 4 § 1 kk
Art. 33 § 1 kk
Art. 33 § 3 kk
Art. 42 § 2 kk
Art. 63 § 4 kk
Art. 43a § 2 kk
Art. 627 k.p.k.
art. 387 k.p.k
Cited Case Law
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedII K 412/14
Court convicted defendant of drunk driving, suspended sentence with two-year driving ban due to prior record.
II K 1071/22
Court acquits defendant for driving under influence because intoxication was proven only after driving ceased.
II K 171/23
Court convicted driver of drunk driving, imposing fine, license ban, and compensation.
II K 729/24
Court convicts drunk driver of dangerous driving, imposing fine, driving ban, compensation, and vehicle forfeiture.