II Ka 688/25
AI generated
Appeal dismissed for excessive sentence; court upheld original penalty and ordered defendant to pay costs.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Court of Appeal dismissed the defendant's appeal regarding excessive sentencing under Article 286 of the Criminal Code. The defendant argued the penalty was disproportionately severe, but the court found no evidence of such disproportionality. Consequently, the original sentence was upheld, and the defendant was ordered to pay all procedural costs.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 286 § 1 kk; Art. 438 § 4 k.p.k.: The court rejected the appeal claiming excessive punishment when the penalty remains within statutory limits and is not grossly disproportionate to the crime's gravity.
Keywords
AI generated
excessive sentence
criminal appeal
disproportionate penalty
Criminal Code
procedural costs
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 286 § 1 kk
Art. 438 § 4 k.p.k.
Art. 636 § 1 k.p.k.
§ 11 ust. 2 pkt 4 i ust. 7 rozporządzenia Ministra Sprawiedliwości z dnia 22 października 2015r. w sprawie opłat za czynności adwokackie
art. 2 ust. 1 pkt 3 i art. 3 ust. 1 w zw. z art. 8 ustawy z dnia 23 czerwca 1973 r. o opłatach w sprawach karnych
art. 438 pkt 1 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 2 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 3 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 4 k.p.k
art. 439 k.p.k
Related Decisions
AI generatedIV Ka 323/25
Appeal dismissed; court upheld conviction and corrected fine calculation error in favor of defendant.
IV Ka 741/22
Appeal dismissed; court rejected procedural error claim regarding absent defendant's valid excuse for non-attendance.
II AKa 299/23
Appeal court partially allowed claim for excessive compensation, raising amount from 2500 to 6000 PLN.
II AKa 288/22
Court dismissed appeal on IP theft conviction, rejecting claims of misclassification and factual errors regarding loan details.
VI Ka 335/24
Criminal appeal dismissed; defense lawyer's appeal against procedural error and factual findings rejected by appellate court.