II Ka 385/25 AI generated

Criminal appeal dismissed; defendant's procedural and factual errors upheld by regional court.

Case Number II Ka 385/25

Court / Authority Sąd powszechny

Jurisdiction

Poland (PL)

Decision Date 2025-08-06

Outcome Dismissed

Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Regional Court in Siedlce dismissed the defendant's appeal against the first-instance judgment convicting him of theft. The defendant argued that the lower court erred in procedure and fact-finding, but the appellate court found no grounds to overturn the original decision. Consequently, the conviction was upheld, and the defendant was ordered to pay the costs of the appeal proceedings.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 438 pkt 2, 3 k.p.k.; Art. 385 § 1 k.k.: An appeal is rejected when the appellate court finds no error in the first-instance judgment regarding procedural violations or factual findings that could have influenced the verdict.

Keywords

AI generated

criminal appeal procedural error factual error costs of proceedings theft conviction regional court dismissal of appeal

Cited Legislation

AI generated

Art. 438 pkt 2 k.p.k.

Art. 438 pkt 3 k.p.k.

Art. 385 § 1 k.k.

Art. 636 k.p.k.

Art. 3 ust. 1 w zw. z art. 8 ustawy z dnia 23 czerwca 1973 r. o opłatach w sprawach karnych

§ 1 Rozporządzenia Ministra Sprawiedliwości z dnia 18 czerwca 2003 r. w sprawie wysokości i sposobu obliczania wydatków Skarbu Państwa w postępowaniu karnym

art. 438 pkt 1 k.p.k

art. 438 pkt 2 k.p.k

art. 438 pkt 3 k.p.k

art. 438 pkt 4 k.p.k

AI generated

IV Ka 678/22

Appeal dismissed; court upheld first-instance conviction as evidence assessment was correct and facts established.

II Ka 337/25

Criminal appeal dismissed; defendant's procedural and factual arguments rejected; first-instance verdict upheld.

II Ka 552/22

Appeal dismissed; defendant's procedural and factual arguments failed to justify changing the first-instance criminal verdict.

II AKa 20/24